Hi .. >Any plans to backport to Woody? >This version brings a lot of bug corrections that affect also Woody. >I now have machines with enough disk space and power to compile it >myself, but this version is not "buildable" as such. It is :) ... I got a successfully build for PPC .. (but with newer binutils/gcc) >I'm trying to do it myself, but I run into some (small) problems: >- why is a newer debhelper version needed? (is it really needed?) because debhelper has a bug, which makes OOo unpackageble ... >- do we really have to backport g++-3.2 to Woody, or is there another >solution? for PPC yes! Upstream dropped the support for older gcc on linux-ppc as gcc-3.1.1. On Intel we can use the gcc-3.0 from, I think! Regards Jan -- .''`. Jan-Hendrik Palic | : :' : ** Debian GNU/ Linux ** | ** OpenOffice.org ** ,.. ,.. `. `' http://www.debian.org | http://www.openoffice.org ,: ..` ` `- jan.palic@linux-debian.de | ' ` `
Attachment:
pgpKJAanJqct9.pgp
Description: PGP signature