Le mer 23/07/2003 à 21:05, Bernhard R. Link a écrit : > * Jérôme Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net> [030723 20:07]: > > Could you point me to such a discussion. > > I'm sorry. I do not keep mailinglist-mails long and it's too long > that I could give keywords for searching. Don't even remember where you read this or more or less at what time? > > I don't know if you followed that, but it was not clear at some point if > > someone would take over the maintenership of tcsh in Debian, which had > > been orphaned. It seems this issue is now resolved. > > I think this is a point to present somewhere. It has been, but is no longer an issue since someone took the package over. > > I feel like building OOo depends already on many packages, and feel > > maybe able to remove this one. On the other side, I never install tcsh, > > nor does Debian by default on any machine. > > There are unfortunatly some old Solaris boxes around here with tcsh > as default. And tcsh is so different to anything else that I have to > install it anywhere where users are involved. (That to say it would > make my life easier, if there were no longer a Debian package). On those Solaris boxes, "ksh" should be available, which should not be too far from plain old bourne shell and then work ok with those. BTW, we are only talking about the build process, not the execution time, which does not depend upon any specific shell. On such old Solaris boxes, I suspect there's really few people willing to build it anyway. Anyway, if you own such a box, I would be interested in testing it afterwards anyway. > Hochachtungsvoll, > Bernhard R. Link -- Jérôme Warnier <jwarnier@beeznest.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=