[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Octave 9 transition



Le lundi 20 mai 2024 à 11:02 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit :
> * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2024-05-20 09:46]:
> 
> > Le dimanche 12 mai 2024 à 00:03 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit :
> > > Rafael
> > > 
> > > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2024-05-11 22:20]:
> > > 
> > > > Le samedi 11 mai 2024 à 11:02 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> > > > > Le mercredi 27 mars 2024 à 14:30 +0100, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> > > > > > I have requested a transition slot for Octave 9 (see #1067842).
> > > > > 
> > > > > The transition has begun.
> > > > 
> > > > It seems that octave-fits is not ready for Octave 9, it needs to be 
> > > > fixed.
> > > 
> > > We might simply ask for removal of octave-fits. The fits package seems 
> > > abandoned and has been superseded by the cfitsio package [1].
> > 
> > Then I suggest that we file a removal request for it.
> 
> Done: https://bugs.debian.org/1071499

Thanks.

> > Please note that the transition is not over, and thus you should 
> > refrain from any upload not related to it. Those uploads will only 
> > delay the transition.
> 
> Oh, sorry, I uploaded octave-statistics 1.6.6-1 recently!

Maybe that upload was actually needed. I’ll investigate and fix any
remaining issue.

> > It looks like upgrading octave-queueing to 1.2.8 would help (the new 
> > release is not at the usual location, it has been moved to GitHub).
> 
> I will take care of octave-queueing.

Thanks.

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  https://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: