Le mardi 10 août 2021 à 08:06 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2021-08-09 20:39]: > > > Le lundi 09 août 2021 à 15:04 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > > > > > > By the way, there is a way to archive repositories in GitLab. According > > > to the description: “Archiving the project will make it entirely read > > > only. It is hidden from the dashboard and doesn't show up in searches. > > > The repository cannot be committed to, and no issues, comments, or other > > > entities can be created”. > > > > > > Should we archive the obsolete repos? When querying through the API, we > > > can set "archived=false" to filter out the archived repos. > > > > > > The following repos could be archived : > > > > > > octave-odepkg > > > octave-ocs > > > octave-pkg-dev > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > I think that archiving them is a good idea. Ideally, before archiving, > > I would remove the commits that never made it into the archive. > > What do you mean by “commits that never made it into the archive”? Do you > mean the commits that were done after the last release of the > corresponding Debian package? Yes. But feel free to archive without removing those commits: it’s easy to find the last uploaded version using the git tags. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part