Le jeudi 21 mai 2020 à 16:08 +0200, Rafael Laboissière a écrit : > * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2020-05-21 14:35]: > > > Given that we have already made a change to this setup, I’m now > > wondering whether we should go a little further: why not renaming > > /etc/octave.conf to /etc/octaverc? That naming would be more consistent > > with upstream naming. This will impose a manual intervention on people > > who have made local modifications to /etc/octave.conf, but they are in > > any case forced to do so because of the above change. > > > > What do you think? > > Sounds good to me. Done in 5.2.0-3. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part