[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Switch octave-pkg-dev from CDBS into dh



On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 09:08:03AM +0100, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> [2017-12-29 21:45]:
> 
> > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 07:56:34PM +0100, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> > > 
> > > If there are no objections, I will soon upload octave-pkg-dev 2.0.0
> > > to unstable and will subsequently commit & upload the Octave-Forge
> > > packages. Then, we will be able to say bye-bye to CDBS.
> > 
> > Ok for me. Thanks for having done this work, I’m happy to say goodbye to
> > cdbs.
> 
> Done (just before New Year's Eve!).  All packages depending on
> octave-pkg-dev have been uploaded to unstable.  Some of them have
> accumulated lots of changes in Git since the last release to unstable. I
> also did some extra QA work, like updating the .gitignore files and fixing
> other bugs.  All in all, it has been a good move, I think.

Thanks! It is clearly a very good move.

Just one little thing: it is not clear to me why you did source+binary uploads
and not source-only uploads. In particular, this implies that we do not have
build logs for amd64 packages. In the future, please do source-only uploads,
except if there is a good reason for not doing it (e.g. NEW uploads).

> The next things to do are : (1) move the repositories into salsa.d.o, (2)
> get the DOG mailing list running at lists.d.o, (3) implement a proper
> dh-based build infrastructure, and (4) add the lacking Octave-Forge packages
> to Debian, perhaps [*].

Wow, what a roadmap for 2018!

Happy New Year! 

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  http://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: