On 09.01.2018 20:37, Rafael Laboissière wrote: > * Oliver Heimlich <oheim@posteo.de> [2018-01-09 11:51]: > >>> [sinp] >>> >>> There is indeed a bug in octave-pkg-dev. I will take a look at this >>> as time permits. >> >> Maybe this line should consider that d/rules builds two binary >> packages and the correct directory might be $shr_dir/doc/$package-doc/ >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-octave-team/octave-pkg-dev/blob/master/install-docs#L16 > > I think I fixed the problem in version 2.0.1 of octave-pkg-dev, which I > uploaded to unstable. > > I will upload a new version of octave-interval soon. Great, thanks again. Is an update of octave-interval really needed? Looking at the tracker, the missing arch:all build no longer shows as a blocker for testing migrations. Also, wouldn't arch:all use the updated octave-pkg-dev during its next try? Oliver
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature