On 28/05/2012 12:54, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > May I suggest one more improvement? It would be great to have the > examples shipped under /usr/share/doc/mwrap/examples (see Policy §12.6 > and dh_installexamples(1)). These examples are mentionned in the > documentation, and they are of great value for a new user of the > package. It’s up to you whether to ship or not the build system of the > examples. Yes, it is a good idea and I've implemented it. I provided the Makefiles (patched) because it illustrate how to use mwrap. However I have dropped the 'fem' examples since they contain generated files using an unpackaged software (matexpr which is another tool of the upstream developer). On 28/05/2012 14:09, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > Another thing: I don't think you should install the NEWS file under > /usr/share/doc/mwrap/changelog. I think it should rather be under > /usr/share/doc/mwrap/NEWS (which I think is the default behavior of > dh_installchangelogs). A changelog is more developer-oriented while a > NEWS file file is more user-oriented. I did it initially because I was tired of the Lintian warning. But Ok I've reverted the change and installed the NEWS file as such. It should be noted that the policy is not clear about it, as pointed by others (http://bugs.debian.org/459427). However it is true that most of the packages use the convention you've described (It is also the one implicitly enforced by dh_installchangelogs). Cheers, Nicolas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature