Apparently, they idea of migrating piecewise to dh_ocaml has been defeated by a few changes in dh-ocaml 0.9 (or possibly before), I see at least two of them as the reason for most bugs: - the removal of the backward compatibility link on the CDBS snippet from class/ocaml.mk to rules/ocaml.mk - the fact that dh_ocaml is (1) executed by default by ocaml.mk (CDBS) and (2) not avoidable While 30 RC bugs are surely fixable quite quickly, I'm a bit disturbed by the fact that we now *have* *to* fix them right ahead de facto forcing the hand on the migration to dh_ocaml, while the initial plans were quite different. I'd like hence to propose a milder strategy, consisting in uploading a new dh_ocaml version which: - reintroduces the backward compatibility link - do not invoke dh_ocaml by default That would enable to migrate bit by bit to dh_ocaml as initially planned. Alternatively, if there is a group of people willing to fix very quickly the 30 FTBFS bugs, I'm happy also with considering the alternative of switching en masse to dh_ocaml, but notice that if we discover some bigger issue later on, we would have to backtrack in a more painful manner. Call me conservative, but I'm a prudent guy :-) Personally, I'll be able to fix in the next week / 10 days the packages I usually upload, hardly more than that or more quickly. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature