On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:44:35PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> I don't really understand. What packages are blocked by lablgtk2 and
> lablgl? They both have the same version in unstable and in testing. Do
> you mean in experimental?
I intended it that way.
> BTW, I think it would be nice to package the CVS version of lablgtk2.
> There have been some nice improvements and it seems that releases of
> lablgtk2 are not so frequent.
Actually CVS (now SVN) changes are quite a lot. First of all lablgtk2
has moved to GNA. Then it has swallowed lablgtksourceview, which we have
in Debian, so there is some migration work to be done between the two
packages (Replaces at all).
It would be great if someone would take care of that, but I think we can
keep that separately to the 3.10 migration. If you want I can mail the
other upstreams to ask if they have a planned release date for the new
Lablgtk2, given the many changes which have been performed.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature