Re: Lablgtk2 and lablgl build
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:44:35PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > I think that somebody should take care of rebuilding lablgtk2 and
> > lablgl in order to unblock a lot of packages.
> >
> > If nobody step in -- and if you authorize me, i will do it.
> >
> > Anyone against this ?
>
> I don't really understand. What packages are blocked by lablgtk2 and
> lablgl? They both have the same version in unstable and in testing. Do
> you mean in experimental?
>
Well, they need to be tested with ocaml 3.10.0 in experimental for the
ongoing transition.
> BTW, I think it would be nice to package the CVS version of lablgtk2.
> There have been some nice improvements and it seems that releases of
> lablgtk2 are not so frequent.
>
I think we should try to stick to the current version. We will have time
to package CVS after the transition to 3.10.0
Regards
Sylvain Le Gall
Reply to: