On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 09:17:04 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > I was noticing some odd ocaml dependency problems on m68k. It looks like > some recent packages got built against ocaml-base-nox-3.09.1 instead of > ocaml-base-nox-3.09.2. libequeue-ocaml seems to be causing me grief in > particular. > Indeed, some packages seem to have been uploaded too early, and built against the old ocaml. Sorry about that :/ > Here's the diff between packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.09.1 for > i386 and m68k. > > I figure that's a decent start at the list of packages I should probably > binNMU on m68k. What do ya'll think? > > +Package: approx > +Package: confluence > +Package: libagrep-ocaml > +Package: libcairo-ocaml > +Package: libcf-ocaml > +Package: libequeue-ocaml > +Package: liblablgtkmathview-ocaml > +Package: liblablgtksourceview-ocaml > +Package: libmad-ocaml > +Package: libmysql-ocaml > +Package: libocamlnet-ocaml > +Package: libsdl-ocaml > +Package: libshout-ocaml > +Package: libsqlite-ocaml > +Package: libssl-ocaml > +Package: libvorbis-ocaml > +Package: mtasc Right, that seems reasonable. So, by source packages (and adding cryptokit, which seems to be missing from your list), that gives this list of binNMU candidates for m68k: approx confluence ocamlagrep cairo-ocaml pagodacf cryptokit equeue lablgl ocaml-mad mysql-ocaml ocamlodbc ocamlsdl ocaml-ssl ocaml-vorbis mtasc Thanks! Julien Cristau
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature