Re: ocaml 3.09.0 and word from the RMs ...

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 02:10:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I spoke with Steve Langasek, and it seems that apart from the following two
> issues, we are go.
> 
>  1) We should not in any case upload lablgtk or any of its reverse dependencies,
>     before the libpng/imlib transition. I think this is a non-issue, because
>     we plan to kind of get rideof lablgtk1 foretch, right ? 
>  
>  2) other uploads, like ocurl, and maybe approx, cduce, or geneweb, which
>     happened recently and are not yet in testing. These we have the choice to
>     wait or have them go in with the ocaml 3.09.0 stuff.
> 
> So, it would be nice if all of you checked your packages, and saw if there is
> a problem and added it here, and for the approx, cduce, occurl, geneweb, ...
> maintainers to come forward and decide whether it should go in (and possibly

Well, geneweb is going in today, and all others seem to be except cduce which
FTBFS on alpha and ia64, but we said we would ignore this problem.

So, we could upload today or tomorrow, but doing it on monday seems
reasonable, and i will do so, starting the upload wave, we should try for a
staged upload like last time, altough there is no urgency, Stefano, could you
again produce the nice dependency graph ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther