Re: Bug#336283: ara: [m68k] FTBFS
On Friday 04 November 2005 21:35, Sven Luther wrote:
--cut--
> > Well, I think I have a solution [1] ... hm a little bit hackish and I'm
> > still not sure if it will hit something else though. Basically what we
> > are trying to solve is a building various arch-specific packages from a
> > common source package depending on the compilers (not)available on
> > certain architectures only. E.g. one source package:
> > -> bytecode debs can be built on all arches
> > -> native debs also can be built on all arches but with diferrent
> > content, e.g. no native binaries if no such compiler available for them.
>
> Well, whatever, but i think you should not care about this, and you can
> just ignore those problems.
Sven,
I basically agree with you, but if we can find any room for improvements then
why not handle such interesting scenarious also ;-) ... hm, so far so good.
Well, I would like to ask Christian T. Steigies or anybody else having such
beasts like m68k/mips*/s390 to try to build the latest trunk swaping rules
for rules.hack [1] since I can only simulate such scenarios moving away my
ocamlopt* files. Any feedback will be appriciated. Thanks.
[1] svn co svn://svn.debian.org/aratrunk/
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
Reply to: