Re: Bug#320779: ocaml :cannot upgrade
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:39:21PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le Mon 1/08/2005, Sven Luther disait
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2005 at 18:55:18 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am still wondering about what emacsen has to do with ocaml-base-nox though.
> > > >
> > > Nothing at all. ocaml-nox, on the other hand, has a Depends:
> > > emacsen-common, because dh_installemacsen adds code to the postinst
> > > which needs this package.
> > > emacsen-common is a tiny package, so I don't think depending on it is a
> > > problem.
> >
> > So why is this guy mentioning that ocaml-base-nox did not install because he
> > didn't want emacsen-common to install ?
> >
> > I still think it would be good to move the emacs stuff into a separate
> > ocaml-emacs package, does this seem ok ?
> >
> > Friendly,
> >
> > Sven Luther
>
> in fact apt-get upgrade did not upgrade ocaml-base-no-x, but a apt-get
> dist-upgrade would have done so, installing emacsen-common with it.
> upgrade does not automatically install new packages.
Mmm, what did you upgrade from ?
Stefano, maybe the right answer would be to have a strict version dependency
between the different ocaml packages ? a ocaml -> deends ocml'base (==version)
or something such ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: