Re: mod_caml and cocanwiki (was: Re: Cocanwiki package)
On Friday 10 September 2004 11:21 am, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Argh, this is all so complex and wrong. Why not use Arch and
> > tla-buildpackage?
>
> Because tla is horrendous and uncomprehensible :)
The docs are better now :-)
www.gnuarch.org
> Well, what guarantee do you have that the tarball will always be
> available ? If nothing else it should always go with the tagged
Why do you need that guarantee?
> versions, but then, arch doesn't support proper tagging anyway.
Actually, it's called configs, but the need for tags/svn cp/whatever is
mostly removed by its design.
> > Arch makes it a lot easier to have a "distributed" group of
> > maintainers, too.
>
> Yeah, but there is benefit for a centralized repo too.
Arch can still do that :-)
Reply to: