[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted meta-ocaml 3.07.3 (all source)



On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 17:45, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Yes, indeed. Today I had a look at it assuming that it was in the need
> of just a trivial fix, but that wasn't the case ... It need some more
> time to be debugged.
I believe I have a working patch for both of the FTBFS bugs.  I'm going
to ask -admin to install the build-deps on a hppa/ia64 box to be sure,
but my tests in my chroot seemed convincing.

-- 
Mike Furr <mfurr@debian.org>
1024D/124B26F3 5B9F 587F BC5C D823 50CE  4DB0 ED93 CA29 124B 26F3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: