Re: opkg-buildpackage vs. svn-buildpackage

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:48:14AM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> Now that I've tried opkg-buildpackage, I like it and I don't think we need to 
> mess with the layout.
> 
> I have updated numerix and cryptokit in the svn repository to merge the 
> existing debian/changelog entries into one, so that an upload sponsor can 
> build -1 packages that include the orig.tar.gz in the upload.  I followed 
> Sylvain's suggestion to close the cryptokit ITP bug via the changelog entry, 
> and added tetex-extra to Numerix's build-depends to get amssymb.sty.  I think 
> they're ready for review and upload, modulo Sylvain and Xavier's review of 
> the RSA implementation against Numerix.

Ok, cool.

Friendly,

Sven Luther