[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ocamlfind issues



On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:13:16PM +0100, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 06:08:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:58:09PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> >> > BTW, about ocamlfind, should you not test that /etc/ocamlfind exists
> >> > before opening the dialog about it ?
> >> 
> >> Uh? If you have findlib installed you have /etc/ocamlfind.conf
> >> 
> >> > BTW2, what about moving /etc/ocamlfind to /etc/ocaml/findlib ?
> >> 
> >> Well, you are right I have to do it, I will do it iff you put the latest
> >> META file I've sent here in the lablgtk package :-PPPPP
> >
> > Mmm, Are you sure everyone agrees in linking gnome and glade in per
> > default ? I think last we discussed it we agreed not to do it. But then,
> > personnally i don't care, i don't use ocamlfind.
> 
> well some hard fact so : I've compiled the following ocaml code with
> different option :
> 
> -- test.ml --
> 
> let rec f x = f (x + 1)
>  
> let _ = f 0
> -- en of test.ml --
> 
> compiled as :
> ocamlc -I +lablgtk lablgtk.cma test.ml -o gtk.out
> ocamlc -I +lablgtk lablgtk.cma lablgnome.cma lablglade.cma test.ml -o all.out
>                                gtk.out       all.out
> size of the executable :       9837          9811
> virtual and resident memory :  1128          1908
> shared memory :                876           1492
> 
> so it's not a so big problem. 

Well, executabl is smaller, but still big. The memory usage is 70%
bigger though.

As said, i don't care, i don't use ocamlfind anyway.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: