Re: cameleon: byte or native?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:52:11PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:10:30PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> >>I surrender. I'm going to do the proper change in order to comply to
> >>your proposal. I do hesitate between making it bytecode only or
> >>adding byte packages. Stefano, what seems to be the best? I'm
> >I've used only a few components of cameleon (topcameleon, zoggy, epeire,
> >...), all of them are IMO suitable to be run in bytecode version because
> >they are almost GUI related and doesn't require a lot of CPU time.
> >Anyway if you know of other cameleon components that are really CPU
> >consuming we can consider having these items shipped in both flavours.
> No I don't. This is why I'm thinking of the bytecode only version.
> We agree that this is for binaries only, not for libraries, right?
Yes, for libraries, you have to ship both versions anyhow, and the
nativecode version is only available if ocamlopt is available, so since
we test for ocamlopt when we do builds, there is no need for more stuff.