On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:10:30PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote: > I surrender. I'm going to do the proper change in order to comply to > your proposal. I do hesitate between making it bytecode only or > adding byte packages. Stefano, what seems to be the best? I'm I've used only a few components of cameleon (topcameleon, zoggy, epeire, ...), all of them are IMO suitable to be run in bytecode version because they are almost GUI related and doesn't require a lot of CPU time. Anyway if you know of other cameleon components that are really CPU consuming we can consider having these items shipped in both flavours. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgpBtY4P6km3d.pgp
Description: PGP signature