[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Plans [Re: Cameleon 1.0]



On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:40:22AM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> >   Well, I grabed the tarball yesterday, unpacked, built and installed
> >   it and everything went OK.
> 
> Ouf !
>  
> >   I started a bit of packaging and I was amazed about the number of
> >   software components it provides.
> > 
> >   I have still not made up my mind about how things should be packaged.
> > 
> >   Here are possible solutions:
> >   - each component in its own package and a cameleon package depending on
> >     all of them (they'll have to have their own version, different from
> >     the cameleon version).
> >   - a set of packages: cameleon (meta package), camaleon-tools, cameleon-libs
> 
> I'm still wondering about having a different version number for each tool.
> Since they are all in the same tarball, and no tool will be released
> without the others, i think i'll give them all the same version number.
> What do you think about that ?

  That would ease things a lot ;) I encourage you to do so.
 
> Independently from this consideration, i think that providing
> a package for each tool or lib (more or less each subdir of cameleon) is better
> because some tools come with their own library too.

  Agreed.
 
> An exception: Okey, Configwin and Gpattern should be in the same package
> because they're all useful when using LablGtk. They need Options, but
> Options should be in its own package, since it does not depend on LablGtk
> and can be used for any application.

  Well, as usual when you gather some components, the major problem is
  to find a name to this gathering ;) Maybe this wouldn't make any difference
  to separate them?

> The documentation browser and the cameleon tool should be in the same package
> since docbrowser contains a lot of cameleon's .cmo files and uses the same
> configuration files.

  OK.

> Here is the list of provided tools and libs (you write e-mails faster than me ;-)
> 
>     * Options
>     * Okey
>     * IoXML
>     * Configwin
>     * Zoggy
>     * Report
>     * Epeire
>     * Topcameleon
>     * OCamlmake-o-matic
>     * OCamlCVS
>     * A documentation browser
>     * MLChat
>     * DBForge
>     * Gpattern
>     * The cameleon tool, as a glue between the other tools.

  Thanks.

-- 
Jérôme Marant



Reply to: