I'm going to upload these packages. Meta-ocaml is now updated with the right dependencies; I've not included in it application developed in ocaml like unison or activedvi. BTW, is ocamltk supposed to be renamed to libtk-ocaml-dev or not? Why? These are the dependencies of ocaml-core and ocaml-libs, check them out to see if something is missing: ocaml-core depends on: camlidl, camlidl-doc, camlp4, camlp4-doc, ledit, ocaml, ocaml-book-fr, ocaml-doc, ocaml-findlib, ocaml-source, ocaml-tools, ocamlweb, tuareg-mode ocaml-libs depends on: libcamlimages-ocaml-dev, libcamlimages-ocaml-doc, libconfigwin-ocaml-dev, liblablgl-ocaml-dev, liblablgtkmathview-ocaml-dev, liblablgtk-ocaml-dev, libmlgtk-ocaml-dev, libmlminidom-ocaml-dev, libnetclient-ocaml-dev, libnetstring-ocaml-dev, libpxp-ocaml-dev, libshell-ocaml-dev, libxlib-ocaml, libxstr-ocaml-dev, libzip-ocaml-dev, ocamltk, zoggy I've kept netstring as it is (instead of packaging ocamlnet) because I had some troubles in packaging ocaml-pcre on which ocamlnet depends on. The reason is that ocaml-pcre embeds in its distribution a copy(!) of libpcre that in debian is distributed in libpcre3 package. Moreover libpcre and ocaml-pcre are really tightly coupled so I've to talk with Markus Mottl (the ocaml-pcre author) on the feasibility of split only the binding away before package it. I hope to talk with him next week, in the meantime we can safely continue in using netstring alone. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgpIJpG3W4Dof.pgp
Description: PGP signature