Re: new packages uploaded ... + zack's report
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:54:19PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> > Also, all library packages providing dlls in a separate (sub)dir should
> > register this directory with /usr/lib/ocaml/ld.conf. I have done this in a
> > postinst/prerm as follows :
> >
> > postinst :
> >
> > echo "/usr/lib/ocaml/lablgl" >>/usr/lib/ocaml/ld.conf
> >
> > prerm :
> >
> > grep -v "/usr/lib/ocaml/lablgl" /usr/lib/ocaml/ld.conf \
> > >/usr/lib/ocaml/ld.conf.debian
> > mv /usr/lib/ocaml/ld.conf.debian /usr/lib/ocaml/ld.conf
>
> This solve a bug that I haven't yet reported, well.
>
> > Which again, may not be the nicest of solution, but does the job.
>
> We may think about (or at least add to a phantomatic todo list) writing
> a dh_ocaml or a similar helper that do things like that and may also
> calculate ocaml dependencies on the fly.
>
> Currently packages of mine are in the following status:
> - ocamlfind -->> uploaded version 0.6.2 (compatible with ocaml 3.04)
> - pxp -->> still working on version 1.1.3, I have some incompatibilites
> with netstring that I'm trying to solve with Gerd
> - netclient -->> still working on version 0.3-Ocaml3.04, same
> incompatibilites as above
> - shell -->> still working on version 0.2.1, the problems probably is
> solved with ocaml 3.04-2 (related to the bug as above)
>
> I'm not sure that netstring related problem are solvable without
> packaging OcamlNET (that include new version of netstring).
mmm, why don't you package ocamlnet, which, if i understood right, is nothing
more than a big package suite with all the smaller libs in it. You could
always take the source and spliut away the libs.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: