Re: What's up?
I replied to Chris about this off-list.
I look forward to seeing what comes of his work. GNUe can certainly use
some help, I did review them earlier. Calendula is long overdue, so I
decided not to go the GNUe route until there is more work done on
documenting and stabilizing its infrastructure (not something I can
spare cycles for).
So from the responses to my original post it looks like there is some
activity percolating out there....
-D
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 12:16, Chris wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2004 01:50 pm, Darryl Caldwell wrote:
> > The list has been fairly quiet. What have you all been doing to further
> > awareness of Free Software to the NGO/NFP masses?
>
> Work on my project, InfoCentral, is still progressing. It has been a little
> slow over the last few months, but I expect faster progress in the near
> future. I have decided to overhaul the code to use the GNU Enterprise
> application server instead of talking directly to the database backend.
> Java/J2EE was also considered but ruled out due to the learning curve /
> administrative overhead / problematic Sun licensing. I would describe GNUe
> as a "KISS" alternative to J2EE. (not to mention completely Free) It should
> be noted that GNUe is largely stagnant right now and needs some development
> help before it can become truly useful. I'm currently investigating their
> code closer and learning Python in preparation to help out.
>
> > On my end, the Calendula fundraising system moves forward. I've been
> > networking with some folks to fine tune the REQs and have rethought
> > through my initial design plans. I will have a PNG of the system
> > workflow up for public consumption soon.
>
> If you have not already, I strongly encourage you to consider the "enterprise
> application server" route. 2-tier monolithic web apps written in
> PHP/Perl/etc. are a dead end when it comes to business-type software. Don't
> make the same mistake that I did. ): btw, one of the great things about
> GNUe is that it provides a means for many "business apps" to be written and
> integrated around the same model. So, for instance, I won't have to write
> accounting features for InfoCentral because that's somebody else's GNUe
> project / component. Similarly, you could write Calendula as a GNUe
> fundraising sub-project rather than a standalone piece of software that is
> far more difficult to integrate.
>
> Chris Gebhardt
> InfoCentral project leader
> www.infocentral.org
--
Darryl Caldwell darrylc@fudosys.com
Fudo Systems www.fudosys.com
206/567-5802 "Free Your Computers!"
Reply to: