Christian Kastner dijo [Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 07:45:36PM +0200]: > On 2016-07-13 10:16, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > > To the community : Should we accept pure pseudo "identifications" in > > Debian ? > > Personally, I wouldn't care about the pseudonym, but I would very much > care about an in-person meeting. > > There was a longer thread about this on -project last year: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2015/02/msg00017.html Absolutely. But signing somebody's ID is done out of personal policy. I always make clear to people how my personal signing policy differs from some other people's (and why I am sometimes flexible upon what I say, if the reality pushes that way). Signing an identity must mean that you verified the identity in a nontrivial way. Signing somebody you have not directly interacted with at all is wrong in my eyes. But, again, find two DDs with active keys in the keyring with personal policies different than mine, and I will accept it. Hell, I won't even be able to know about it :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature