Re: Advocacy for Harlan Lieberman-Berg
- To: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, Paul Wise via nm <pabs@debian.org>, debian-newmaint@lists.debian.org, Harlan Lieberman-Berg <H.LiebermanBerg@gmail.com>, nm@debian.org, archive-H.LiebermanBerg=gmail.com@nm.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Advocacy for Harlan Lieberman-Berg
- From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 15:02:21 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20140831220221.GA3411@enricozini.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>, Paul Wise via nm <pabs@debian.org>, debian-newmaint@lists.debian.org, Harlan Lieberman-Berg <H.LiebermanBerg@gmail.com>, nm@debian.org, archive-H.LiebermanBerg=gmail.com@nm.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20140831194814.GC2169@virgil.dodds.net>
- References: <[🔎] 20140831030130.16754.50948@nono.debian.org> <[🔎] 20140831194814.GC2169@virgil.dodds.net>
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:48:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Since when is it acceptable to advocate someone for a technical role in
> Debian while having no direct knowledge of their technical work?
Indeed it is not acceptable, and I have just undone it.
Advocacies based on just a chat instead of on experience of working
together have been rejected in the past and continue to be rejected.
Thank you Steve for spotting this.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: