[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: on the "M" of "NM" - summary

Re: Iain Lane 2011-10-11 <[🔎] 20111011120007.GA31968@raleigh>
> Frankly, I don't think it'll be confusing at all. Both meanings will
> continue to live on for a while, and then if we consistently refer to
> New Member instead of New Maintainer, the old one will fade away.
> This is a good incremental change that helps us along the way to
> clearing up the misleading titles we give to people.

Exactly. Thanks zack for the excellent suggestion!

cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: