Hi, On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 04:02:16PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Regarding the example of #443702 (fuse-source's NMU), there are many > examples of DDs not replying positively to NMUs, so it doesn't seem fair > to reject DM/DD based on this. A recent example is #459193, where > Aurélien Gérôme (currently waiting for DAM approval) didn't answered > very welcomly to an NMU I sponsored. Are there other examples of > socially-incorrect behaviour from Adam? Sorry, but I fail to see the relation between my behaviour in #459193 and Adam's in #443702. I do not mind receiving a NMUdiff in a bug report and I certainly like the idea. However, I was upset to find the so-said NMUdiff in a DELAYED queue 20 minutes later, without giving me time to anwser. I learnt during the NM process that NMUers are supposed to contact the maintainer before rushing forward. This is at least what I did in #451417, #450446, and #434150. Cheers, -- .''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME : :' : `. `'` Debian Maintainer `- Unix Sys & Net Admin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature