[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NM Report for Week Ending 23 Mar 2008



Re: Paul Wise 2008-03-24 <[🔎] e13a36b30803240014w5ad0110kabb11b32e6675106@mail.gmail.com>
> >  The following applicants are not AM approved but have an inactive AM:
> 
> Would anyone object to me manually mailing these NMs prompting them to
> contact FD to ask for a new AM? I think that I should also CC the AMs
> and FD on that mail.

Please do, help there is appreciated.

> >  The following applicants have been on hold longer than 6 months:
> 
> Same here, should I ping the AMs to see if their NMs should be soft-rejected?

Good idea.

Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: