[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ordering of unassigned applicants



On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 12:24:13PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> > 3. isaac is assigned for my AM on 04th of April 2006
> > 4. danchev@spnet.net is still in the unassigned queue.
> >
> > So I am curious, how is the unassigned queue processed?
> 
> More or less in order, with some exceptions: People without a notable
> contribution don't get an AM, but are informed per mail and I try to

What is considered a "notable contribution"?

> match up AMs with the first few applicants in the queue of unassigned
> people. It's normally better if KDE-related people get AMs who have at
> least a bit of KDE packaging experience, for example.
> Also, I try to assign clearly "easy" cases to new AMs, which means
> applicants who are active, have a signed gpg key and are not known for
> flamewars.

Aha!

-- 
Ciao...                //        Fon: 0381-2744150 
      Ingo           \X/         SIP: 2744150@sipgate.de

gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc



Reply to: