Re: New version of nm-step2
* Andrew Suffield <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2003-08-07 18:02]:
> I, for one, would rather not have this presented here, but instead
> leave it to the AM to decide whether to suggest it to an applicant or
> not. I've had one or two applicants who should have waited before
> applying, until they had an opportunity to get their keys signed.
I think only the signed GPG method should be described explicitly with
a mention that "alternative methods" are available if a signed GPG key
is not possible. In that case, they should imho contact the Front
Desk to they can check the situation and say what to do.