[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New version of nm-step2

* Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> [2003-08-07 18:02]:
> I, for one, would rather not have this presented here, but instead
> leave it to the AM to decide whether to suggest it to an applicant or
> not. I've had one or two applicants who should have waited before
> applying, until they had an opportunity to get their keys signed.

I think only the signed GPG method should be described explicitly with
a mention that "alternative methods" are available if a signed GPG key
is not possible.  In that case, they should imho contact the Front
Desk to they can check the situation and say what to do.

Martin Michlmayr

Reply to: