Re: New version of nm-step2
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:02:28PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:17:22AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:46:22PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > Some time ago I wrote a new version of the devel/join/nm-step2 page.
> > > After asking for a first feedback I've forgotten this.
> > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2003/debian-www-200308/msg00065.html
> > > <li>
> > > <p>The applicant can provide a digital image of an ID signed
> > > with his GPG key. This image should be send to his
> > > <a href="newmaint#AppMan">Application Manager (AM)</a>.</p>
> > As I have read email@example.com, there were strong
> > opposition to this type of prone to abuse GPG signing procedure. If we
> > keep this alternative GPG verification method in updated nm-step2 page,
> > we may want to change this something like:
> I, for one, would rather not have this presented here, but instead
> leave it to the AM to decide whether to suggest it to an applicant or
> not. I've had one or two applicants who should have waited before
> applying, until they had an opportunity to get their keys signed.
I prefer this too :-) That's why I started with "If" and phrased with
"last resort". With following paragraph mentioning discussion, we
really avoid this type of GPG practice.
> .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
> : :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
> `. `' |
> `- -><- |