Re: Fixed bugs
On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:45:52AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 09:42:25AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> > * Martin Michlmayr
> >> Also, some sponsors upload packages in a (wrong) way which tags
> >> bugs as "fixed" instead of closing them properly.
> > I suspect this may be caused by the sponsorship page, which
> > instructs the sponsor to rebuild the sponsored package using
> > "dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -m'Happy Sponsor <firstname.lastname@example.org>'".
> > Naturally, this will be interpreted as a NMU, hence the fixed tag.
> > The correct would be to replace -m'Happy Sponsor ..' with
> > -k0x<sponsor's PGP key ID>; then changelog-closed bugs would be
> > closed properly.
> Either that or building with -uc -us and using debsign afterwards.
> (Both debsign -k0x<sponsor's PGP key ID> and -m'Happy Sponsor ..'
> work correctly).
> I prefer this way, and it is the one deverloper's reference suggests.
I'm confused. Here's what I understand from the above:
Tore says that -m'Happy Sponsor <email@example.com>' will cause bugs to
be tagged fixed instead of closed.
Andreas says that -m'Happy Sponsor <firstname.lastname@example.org>' will cause bugs
to be closed instead of tagged fixed.
Would the real -m'Happy Sponsor <email@example.com>' please stand up?
Matt Kraai <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Debian GNU/Linux Peon