Re: task & skills
- To: email@example.com
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: task & skills
- From: Mariusz Przygodzki <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 22:42:35 +0100
- Message-id: <00120322423501.19953@dune>
- In-reply-to: <20001203213938.B3781@sigrid.schuldei.com>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20001203151456.A545@xanadu.kublai.com> <20001203213938.B3781@sigrid.schuldei.com>
On Sunday 03 December 2000 21:39, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> * Brendan Cully (email@example.com) [001203 21:18]:
> > The maintainer has a lot of responsibility for integrating all these
> > contributions in a sane way, so that changes don't break systems,
> > don't break upgrades, don't break removals, and work with the rest of
> > the debian system. You can't do these things reliably without a good
> > amount of knowledge about the package system, and some experience on
> > top of that.
> Quite a limited perspective, wouldn't you agree? As if Debian was only
> about packages?
That's not limited perspective but requirements for a fundamental knowledge
about Debian, like a primary school.
> And this way you create a new bottleneck: the webmaintainer collects the
> webpatches, the hurd maintainer collects all the hurd patches etc....
> Look at the linux kernel for an example of a one person bottleneck.
> Quality and speed of releases is not improving.
I can not agree about a quality (see discussions on kernel.org) but
personally I don't care about "an improving speed of releases" to much until
Debian is a non-commercial distribution.
> Then call him a developer. You are right: Maintainers maintain packages,
> developer develop new stuff.
Nope. Debian maintaners maintain packages and, if it's necessary, make (lots
Mariusz Przygodzki | Good judgement comes from experience.
firstname.lastname@example.org | Experience comes from bad judgement.
GPG KeyID: 0x42FAD771
GPG Fingerprint: 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771