Re: A weekly report?
Anand Kumria <wildfire@progsoc.uts.edu.au> writes:
> > Weekly Summary Statistics
> > =========================
> > 13 more people applied to become a new maintainer
> > 9 applicants became maintainers.
>
> I think you mean `were passed on the DAM' because the ones you list
> below a couple have not had their accounts created.
Eh? All the people Craig listed have had their accounts created. [See
end of mail]
> If you take up the distinction between passed to DAM / new maintainer
> then how about ading a 'accounts created' this week section as well.
Err, why should that part (num/names of applicants passed to DAM) of
the process be special cased? I have no objection to Craig taking
over/automating the publication of "new debian maintainer
announcements", but I do object to it including the num/names of
applicants passed to DAM.
> > New Maintainers
> > ===============
> > The following applicants became new maintainers last week:
>
> s/became new maintainers/were handed to the DAM/
Again, no.
> > Britton Kerin <fsblk@aurora.uaf.edu>
> > Benjamin C. Hill <makolee@bork.hampshire.edu>
> > Dr. Guenter Bechly <GBechly@gmx.de>
> > Drew Parsons <dparsons@emerall.com>
> > Angus Lees <gusl@cse.unsw.edu.au>
> > Ondrej Sury <ondrej@sury.cz>
> > Philip Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
> > Philip Brown <phil@bolthole.com>
> > Robert McQueen <robert.mcqueen@hands.com>
Subject: New Debian maintainer Britton Leo Kerin
Subject: New Debian maintainer Benjamin Hill
Subject: New Debian maintainer Guenter Bechly
Subject: New Debian maintainer Drew Parsons
Subject: New Debian maintainer Angus Lees
Subject: New Debian maintainer Ondrej Sury
Subject: New Debian maintainer Philip Blundell
Subject: New Debian maintainer Philip Brown
Subject: New Debian maintainer Robert McQueen
--
James
Reply to: