Re: Problem application
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:56:37AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> I see no other course than to act on such information when it is presented
> to us from the outside community. On the other hand, I don't see it as
> being proper to simply accept that outside information without letting the
> applicant defend himself, so I guess I'm looking for a proceedure to allow
> that defense to occur.
Now I see what you are getting at.
> I would prefer that the evidence be presented to the group, possibly with
> some kind of voting proceedure, so that no one AM must shoulder the
> responsibility of the decission to exclude the applicant.
>
> While we are not strictly "deligates of the DPL" we do enjoy the full
> support of the DAM in this reguard. We may still need to present our
> "findings" to him for final approval, but I don't want him to have to
> shoulder the responsibility for the decission on _his_ own either. This is
> a problem that is better shared.
I understand what you're getting at now. Yes, I agree with you that
this would be a useful thing to do. I don't really know how, though.
But we must tell the applicant early on, though.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: