Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe
Jim Westveer writes:
> On 03-Aug-2000 Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > Dale Scheetz writes:
> > > I just can't understand the reluctance to satisfy this requirement except
> > > that it is viewed by some as being too hard. I cannot, for the life of me,
> > You've not been reading my emails then. I don't want random people
> > having a copy of my passport digitised (worse still, digitised and
> > signed my me). I know other people who would be unhappy about
> > this. It's not necessary, so ditch it.
> AAAAHHH its the copy of the passport idea you do not like.
> It does NOT say "Passport" or "Drivers Licence" or anything of that sort.
> It simply says "appropriate piece of photo-identification".
So? Passport was mearly a convenient example. Any form of photo-id
that's meaningful I don't want people to have digitised copies of
> I would think that having ones key signed, as important as it might be,
> is a totally different level of trust than having ones key put in the
> Debian keyring.
*boggle* The whole point of keysigning is that you trust this person,
and they should be included in your web of trust - i.e. your keyring.
Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire