Re: Tuning the system for jackd
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Robert Joerdens wrote:
> Plus: There is kernel-patch-2.4-lsm. And last time i checked 2.4 was still the
> default kernel. So we can build on (manybe recommend) kernel-patch-2.4-lsm.
Ah, thats good to know.
> > Then, this would need to be someone who has a bit of insight into
> > linux security modules, in order to explain him why he should change it,
> > and to make sure that it actually doesn't harm security.
>
> He favours including LSM.
>
> <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200312/msg01713.html>
Yes, I have quoted that same link some messages ago, note that the
proposal includes a patch that compiles LSM but it doesn't compile it
as a module (which is what we need).
Anyhow, I am going to file an ITP of the realtime LSM, as it seems that
this is the preferred method of aquiring realtime privileges, then we try
to solve the rest.
Guenter
Reply to: