Re: [Agnula-Developers] [ demudi-Feature Requests-723 ] Compile Muse 0.6.3 with givertcap support
>>>>> "joq" == Jack O'Quin <joq@io.com> writes:
joq> I see your point, Guenter.
joq> It was for similar reasons that I initially focused on the
joq> LSM approach before spending time on the kernel patch. For a
joq> long time to come that will be the preferred approach, and I
joq> want to make sure it works well.
joq> guenter geiger <geiger@xdv.org> writes:
>> My main concern is, if it is worth the effort. The module
>> solution for 2.6 is a lot easier to integrate into Debian. Very
>> clean, separate package, only care has to be taken that it is
>> available for all kernel flavours.
joq> AFAIK, the LSM has no CPU dependencies. But, it has probably
joq> only been tested on x86 so far.
joq> If there are still Debian platforms that don't run 2.6 or
joq> can't support the SELinux LSM hooks, they will be a problem.
As far as Debian Multimedia and DeMuDi are concerned, I don't know
whether there are people around these project using platform other
than i386/powerpc, but I guess none or very few. I agree with Guenter
and I think that the most feasible choice, is to start working on the
2.6 series. It would be nice if we could upload a custom kernel tuned
for audio work directly to the official Debian unstable branch, if not
we can host it in the DeMuDi pool.
Is somebody already packaging Jack's and Torben's kernel module for
the 2.6?
bye,
free
Reply to: