Re: mips64el in testing
- To: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
- Cc: YunQiang Su <syq@debian.org>, debian-release <debian-release@lists.debian.org>, "debian-mips@lists.debian.org" <debian-mips@lists.debian.org>, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>, Aron Xu <aron@debian.org>, James Cowgill <jcowgill@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: mips64el in testing
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@ayous.org>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:58:58 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20160605205858.GX25400@mails.so.argh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@ayous.org>, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>, YunQiang Su <syq@debian.org>, debian-release <debian-release@lists.debian.org>, "debian-mips@lists.debian.org" <debian-mips@lists.debian.org>, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>, Aron Xu <aron@debian.org>, James Cowgill <jcowgill@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 07f36639-fed4-1342-b7e1-cae9ca4d06ba@thykier.net>
- References: <56DB0BF9.7010403@debian.org> <20160306002151.GA29109@aurel32.net> <56E30820.9060600@gmail.com> <[🔎] 3d41fca8-3231-bfa9-bf53-c9e9a149eb70@thykier.net> <[🔎] CAKcpw6U-8qd0Ev2nj9hg902LqBcT2BifWzyyVqyver9ogxrRag@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 07f36639-fed4-1342-b7e1-cae9ca4d06ba@thykier.net>
* Niels Thykier (niels@thykier.net) [160605 22:45]:
> In other words, there is a DSA buildd?
>
> I notice we have the following list of mipsel/mips64el buildds:
>
> * mips64el: eberlin, mipsel-aql-01, mipsel-aql-02, mipsel-manda-01,
> mipsel-manda-02
> - I presume none of them are DSA given mips64el currently has a note
> of not having a DSA buildd.
All of them are the normal DSAed machines, also used for mipsel. The
note is probably quite old.
> * mipsel: mayer, eysler, rem, phrixos (non-DSA), helle (non-DSA)
>
> Are these lists up to date?
Not at all.
There is a common set of DSAed-buildds for both, and that is the list
as of above for mips64el plus mipsel-aql-03 (for both arches). For
mips64el, there are additional to that list thor, clash and lm6100
active.
Andi
Reply to: