Re: mipsel BuildD upload problem?
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:31:49PM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:36:14AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'd especially agree with qt-x11-free. This is *really* urgent; we
> > need a working version of KDE in sarge so that it can be released,
> > and it's hard work trying to persuade the KDE maintainers not to
> > upload KDE 3.2 before that happens, which I reckon will set sarge
> > back at least another month or two.
> > Having an up-to-date qt-x11-free on mipsel and thus some progress of
> > KDE packages into testing will help matters a great deal.
> I have built qt-x11-free, but I currently have no time for testing the
> packages. Any volunteers?
If it was built on a reasonably normal unstable system, the build log
looks sane, and a debdiff against some other architecture is clean, I'd
say upload it.
(AIUI, buildd admins don't do any more than this except for the
occasional toolchain package.)
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]