Re: mipsel BuildD upload problem?
Colin Watson <email@example.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:31:49PM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:36:14AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > I'd especially agree with qt-x11-free. This is *really* urgent; we
> > > need a working version of KDE in sarge so that it can be released,
> > > and it's hard work trying to persuade the KDE maintainers not to
> > > upload KDE 3.2 before that happens, which I reckon will set sarge
> > > back at least another month or two.
> > >
> > > Having an up-to-date qt-x11-free on mipsel and thus some progress of
> > > KDE packages into testing will help matters a great deal.
> > I have built qt-x11-free, but I currently have no time for testing the
> > packages. Any volunteers?
> If it was built on a reasonably normal unstable system, the build log
> looks sane, and a debdiff against some other architecture is clean, I'd
> say upload it.
> (AIUI, buildd admins don't do any more than this except for the
> occasional toolchain package.)
Building KDE should be a reasonable testcase for it. :)