On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:06:58PM +0000, The Fungi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 10:55:22PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > By looking at it - is there a reason why we provide mop images ? I > > thought mopd is able to boot/serv elf ? Wouldnt it be easier to let it also > > boot/serv ecoff ? > > Last I checked, the mopd package in Debian was inches from being > orphaned. There is a wishlist bug asking to incorporate a few > patches that are a rev out of date to, among other things, provide > the correct byte order to boot DECstations. I compiled from the > NetBSD source and patches and was able to mop boot my 5000/240, but > I didn't have time to update said patches to the version of mopd > source in Debian--looked somewhat involved. I believe I still have > the patches on hand if anyone else wants to take up the banner and > can't locate them. Took me a bit of hunting... The problem with mopd is that there is no real upstream - There are hundrets of version + hundrets of patches floating around. The mopd of marciej is a good base to start with and probably make a new debian package. Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912 Heisenberg may have been here.
Attachment:
pgpPmwvpc5Ewk.pgp
Description: PGP signature