thanks for your time testing my upload!
Apparently, piuparts tries to install the package 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.1
instead of 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2, why?
In the old package 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.1, the control file contains
libmumps-seq-5.3.1 as libfreefem++ dependency which does not exist
anymore in sid. The control file of the build package (3.61.1+dfsg1-
5.2) indicates libmumps-seq-5.3, which exists in sid.
The problem is not new  and it appears since the version 5.3.4 of
mumps. In the mumps changelog , we can read:
> MUMPS is now ABI-compatible in the minor version.
> Provide new packages as libmumps-5.3, etc instead of libmumps-5.3.4
I think that rebuilding the package and using puipart with the
3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 should be fine.
Let me know if I'm missing something.
Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 22:31 +0200, Anton Gladky a écrit :
> Your upload is fine. It fixes the FTBFS. But piuparts
> identified some problems with the installation of libfreefem++-dev
> Could you please verify whether the problem really exists or not?
>  https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/freefempp/-/jobs/1640984
> Am Do., 13. Mai 2021 um 19:27 Uhr schrieb François Mazen <
> > Dear Science Team,
> > In case of a DD in this list is interested: I'm forwarding my
> > Request
> > For Sponsor about RC bug that I've just fixed in the freefem++
> > package.
> > It should prevent the removal of the package in the next release.
> > Then, I volunteer to maintain this package as it need to be updated
> > with the new upstream version.
> > Best Regards,
> > François