[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#988474: [Fwd: Bug#988474: RFS: freefem++/3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 [NMU] [RC] -- Provides the binaries of the FreeFem++ FE suite]

Hello Anton,

thanks for your time testing my upload!

Apparently, piuparts tries to install the package 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.1
instead of 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2, why?

In the old package 3.61.1+dfsg1-5.1, the control file contains
libmumps-seq-5.3.1 as libfreefem++ dependency which does not exist
anymore in sid. The control file of the build package (3.61.1+dfsg1-
5.2) indicates libmumps-seq-5.3, which exists in sid.

The problem is not new [1] and it appears since the version 5.3.4 of
mumps. In the mumps changelog [2], we can read:

> MUMPS is now ABI-compatible in the minor version.
> Provide new packages as libmumps-5.3, etc instead of libmumps-5.3.4

I think that rebuilding the package and using puipart with the
3.61.1+dfsg1-5.2 should be fine.

Let me know if I'm missing something.


[1] https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/f/freefem++.html
[2] https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/m/mumps/changelog-5.3.5-2

Le jeudi 13 mai 2021 à 22:31 +0200, Anton Gladky a écrit :
> Your upload is fine. It fixes the FTBFS. But piuparts
> identified some problems with the installation of  libfreefem++-dev
> [1].
> Could you please verify whether the problem really exists or not?
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/freefempp/-/jobs/1640984
> Thanks
> Anton
> Am Do., 13. Mai 2021 um 19:27 Uhr schrieb François Mazen <
> francois@mzf.fr>:
> > Dear Science Team,
> > 
> > In case of a DD in this list is interested: I'm forwarding my
> > Request
> > For Sponsor about RC bug that I've just fixed in the freefem++
> > package.
> > It should prevent the removal of the package in the next release.
> > 
> > Then, I volunteer to maintain this package as it need to be updated
> > with the new upstream version.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > François
> > 

Reply to: