Re: Future of "obsession" package
those constants changes irritates , fbautostart seems is just a window
like way to make window managers (that are not desktops environments)
more away of the meaning of.. and always in the future those "little"
changes must be changed again.. why not just let openbox as simple as
possible?
El dom., 15 de nov. de 2020 a la(s) 12:25, Fabien Givors (Debian)
(f+debian@chezlefab.net) escribió:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 03:03:08PM +0100, Fabien Givors wrote:
> >> However, I found out that there were a sudden (yet relative) rise
> >> in popcon usage: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=obsession
> >> so, there are users…
>
> Le 15/11/2020 à 15:39, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit :
> > That's because openbox now Recommends it.
> Oh, ok, thanks Andrey, this explains that!
>
> >> I see different solutions:
> >>
> >> 1) remove xdg-autostart, recommend fbautostart
> >> 2) remove xdg-autostart, depends on fbautostart, add a wrapper for
> >> xdg-autostart to fbautostart
> >> 3) find an alternative to obsession-logout and obsession-exit
> >> binaries and replace obsession with a transition package
> >> What are your thoughts about that?
>
> Le 15/11/2020 à 15:29, Mateusz Łukasik a écrit :
> > openbox-menu have or maybe I should use word had the same upstream
> > author as obsession. Now I going to replace with jgmenu (see
> > #882210) and remove openbox-menu from repository.
> >
> > At point 3 I think solution already exists in jgmenu. Second option
> > is find magic exit script in super beauty openbox based distros like
> > BunsenLabs Linux and port it to Debian.
>
> I see, so are you going to remove the Recommends for obsession from
> openbox package and replace it with jgmenu?
>
> And should I just ask for a RM of obsession?
> Or replace it with a transitional package recommending fbautostart and
> jgmenu?
>
>
> PS: I'm on the list
>
> --
> fabien (captnfab on IRC)
>
Reply to: