Re: Doubt: update-alternative during debian/rules? (GTK2 vs GTK3)

To: JOSE LUIS BLANCO CLARACO <jlblanco@ual.es>
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Doubt: update-alternative during debian/rules? (GTK2 vs GTK3)
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 22:41:18 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20181113214118.izp3ydafvrwvonnp@nucold>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CADEiKfiPdVjiU9Q0+f6W1URUOway4UqbdZk+9WN2w-JZxQ3zng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CADEiKfiPdVjiU9Q0+f6W1URUOway4UqbdZk+9WN2w-JZxQ3zng@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 01:26:11PM +0100, JOSE LUIS BLANCO CLARACO wrote:

> And my question is: is it "acceptable" to run `update-alternatives`
> during debian/rules? [...]

I don't think so. Would that work at all if you are using fakeroot?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Doubt: update-alternative during debian/rules? (GTK2 vs GTK3)
  - From: Miroslav Kravec <kravec.miroslav@gmail.com>

References:
- Doubt: update-alternative during debian/rules? (GTK2 vs GTK3)
  - From: JOSE LUIS BLANCO CLARACO <jlblanco@ual.es>

Prev by Date: Bug#913091: RFS: scdoc/1.5.2-1
Next by Date: Re: Questions regarding orphaned package and transition
Previous by thread: Doubt: update-alternative during debian/rules? (GTK2 vs GTK3)
Next by thread: Re: Doubt: update-alternative during debian/rules? (GTK2 vs GTK3)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread