On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 09:12:05AM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > >> The package builds just fine without intermediated cleaning, it is just > >> gbp that complains about uncommitted changes to the source tree. That's > >> why I think I'm missing something about the gbp workflow, as I think > >> that systematically using --git-ignore-new is not the right thing. > > > > The gbp workflow implies you are not building in-tree. > > Thanks! That is what I was missing. > > Would it make sense to have this highlighted more prominently in the > documentation of gbp? I don't recall seeing it mentioned anywhere. I can > prepare a patch. Where would be a good place to add it? > > Why is building off-tree the recommended workflow? All I know is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859594#17 -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature