Re: Review of firefox-branding-iceweasel
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Yes, it should definitely be xul-ext-iceweasel-branding -- that's
> pkg-mozext policy for anything that appears in about:addons. dh_xul-ext
> assumes that your package is called xul-ext-foo, and it will generate a
> Provides: entry for firefox-foo.
The package name was suggested by Mozilla folks:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815006#145
> How about adding a new file /usr/share/applications/iceweasel.desktop
> that launches firefox with the old icon? This would make this extension
> conflict with iceweasel, but I think that would be okay so long as you
> added a Conflicts: line in d/control.
I think it would be best to handle this in the iceweasel package instead.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: